Although it's not as easy as Sorcerer's Stone, it is still very nicely detailed. I get this movie is trying to be campy, but that goes way too far. Draco also became more annoying now, with constantly trying to bully Harry even though he can't do a thing. Sure he does get a wholesome ending, but that's yet to see how he turns out. If I were to behave like that my mom would have slapped me all across the face. Speaking of Dobby, he's had a very bad introduction. ![]() There are plenty of examples of bad CGI in the movie but I don't want to take it too far. And when Harry puts Dobby in the wardrobe it looked more like the wind is opening the door instead of Dobby. When he was banging his head in the drawer in the beginning of the movie, the shelves of the drawer were shaking in the opposite direction of where they should shake. But other than the Basilisk, most of the CGI hasn't aged so well. ![]() And that's actually really surprising because the first one was so good so this one should have had a higher budget and thus more advanced VFX. To begin with, the movie's CGI hasn't aged pretty well. With that in mind I watched the second movie today and sadly, it doesn't live up to the mark on almost any of the parameters. I was expecting all of them to be as simplistic and visually appealing as that movie. ![]() After watching Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone I had gotten really high hopes for the Harry Potter franchise.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |